Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Frederico Ferreira Silva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Is second serve performance important in match predictions? Absolutely. In recent competitions, Silva has been more effective on their second serve, winning 46.18% of points compared to Kjaer's 43.75%.
• How do they fare on return games? Silva secures 44.1% of opponent's second serve points, while Kjaer is slightly better at 45.31%. For first serve returns, Kjaer again edges out Silva with 28.84% against 27.68%.
• Who handles pressure better? Silva saves breakpoints more efficiently at 52.13%, compared to Kjaer’s 50.52%, indicating stronger resilience under pressure.
• Overall performance review: Silva shows a stronger record in the last year, winning 68.06% of their matches, while Kjaer has a win rate of 58.06%.
• Surface preferences show disparity. Silva excels on Hard courts with a 68% win rate, whereas Kjaer has the same 68% success rate on I.hard surfaces.
• Does experience level matter? Silva's frequent participation in Futures/Satellites with an impressive 80.85% win rate contrasts with Kjaer’s experience in Challengers, where they won 56.25% of matches.
• What about opponent caliber? Kjaer has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, averaging rank 313.53 against Silva's 333.
• Deciding set dynamics: Silva outperforms in deciding sets, clinching 70% of them, while Kjaer sits at 59%.
• Converting breakpoints is crucial. Silva is more proficient, converting 37.37% of opportunities; Kjaer follows closely with 35.03%.

Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance patterns, Silva exhibits a slightly higher efficiency on second serves, which heavily influences match outcomes. This could be a pivotal factor in tight games.

When comparing return games, Kjaer marginally surpasses Silva on both the opponent’s first and second serve returns, suggesting a potential edge in breaking serves.

Silva’s consistent ability to handle pressure, evidenced by a higher breakpoint save percentage, adds to their favor, particularly in crucial moments of a match.

While Silva’s overall match-winning percentage over the past year is more impressive, Kjaer’s experience competing against slightly tougher opposition may even the playing field.

The choice of court surface might impact outcomes, with Silva’s advantage on Hard courts and Kjaer’s preference for I.hard surfaces making the venue a significant consideration.

Given Silva’s dominant deciding set performance, along with superior breakpoint conversion rates, the prediction leans towards Silva as the more likely winner in the upcoming match.